-
Editor In Chief:
Wendy Gerwick Couture
Associate Professor at the
University of Idaho
College of Law SEARCH THIS SITE
Categories
- IDAHO BUSINESS LAW TOPIC
- BANKRUPTCY
- CONTRACTS
- CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
- EMPLOYMENT
- INSURANCE
- LAND SALES
- LAND USE
- PROPERTY SECURITY
- STATUTES
- Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Federal Credit Reporting Act
- Idaho Business Corporation Act
- Idaho Code 45-501
- Idaho Code 5-219
- Idaho Code 67-6516
- Idaho Code 9-503
- Idaho Consumer Protection Act
- Idaho Human Rights Act
- Idaho Protection of Public Employees Act
- Idaho Trust Deed Act
- Idaho Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act
- Idaho Uniform Partnership Act
- WARN Act
- TORTS
- OPINION AUTHOR
- Hon. B. Lynn Winmill
- Hon. Candy W. Dale
- Hon. Daniel T. Eismann
- Hon. Edward J. Lodge
- Hon. Jim D. Pappas
- Hon. Jim Jones
- Hon. Joel D. Horton
- Hon. John P. Luster
- Hon. John T. Mitchell
- Hon. Justin L. Quackenbush
- Hon. Larry M. Boyle
- Hon. Mikel H. Williams
- Hon. Roger S. Burdick
- Hon. Terry L. Myers
- Hon. Warren E. Jones
- SUMMARY AUTHOR
- IDAHO BUSINESS LAW TOPIC
Archive Articles
Category Archives: Hon. Justin L. Quackenbush
WARN Act Prohibits the Termination of Warned Employees During the Notice Period, Even if Fewer Than 50 Employees Are Affected
Court Rules that the WARN Act Prohibits the Termination of Warned Employees During the Notice Period, Even if Fewer Than 50 Employees Are Affected
Whether an employer could terminate employees who were given a WARN Act notice within the 60-day notice period, so long as the number of terminated employees did not exceed the 50 required to trigger the notice requirement. Continue reading
Posted in Hon. Justin L. Quackenbush, IDAHO BUSINESS LAW TOPIC, STATUTES, WARN Act, Wendy Couture
Comments Off